Sudan’s Military Rejects UAE Claims of Attack on Diplomatic Residence, Blames RSF
Sudan’s military denies UAE accusations of an airstrike on its ambassador’s residence in Khartoum, attributing the incident to the RSF instead. The UAE condemns the attack and insists it was a military bombing, demanding accountability. This contention arises amid escalating violence in the capital, where recent clashes have intensified. Both parties have exchanged allegations of support and involvement in the ongoing conflict.
The Sudanese military has categorically denied allegations from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) regarding an attack on the UAE ambassador’s residence in Khartoum. The army attributes the incident to the paramilitary group known as the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has been a central faction in Sudan’s ongoing conflict. On the other hand, the UAE asserts that the damage incurred at the ambassadorial residence was due to a strike by a Sudanese military aircraft, condemning the act as a “heinous attack.” This exchange of accusations comes amidst escalating violence in the capital city, where clashes have intensified over the last few days. The Sudanese foreign ministry responded to the UAE’s claims by labelling them as “false allegations,” accusing the RSF of perpetrating acts of aggression. The Sudanese army has a history of alleging that the UAE has provided military support to the RSF throughout the protracted conflict, a contention that the UAE vehemently denies. However, it is noteworthy that United Nations sanctions monitors have considered the claims of UAE support to the RSF to be credible. In light of the turmoil, the UAE reported casualties following the alleged attack and demanded that the Sudanese army accept full responsibility for the assault. The official UAE news agency, WAM, referred to the bombing as a “flagrant violation of the fundamental principle of the inviolability of diplomatic premises.” The Sudanese government maintained that the RSF is the true perpetrator of the violence, charging them as a “terrorist, rebel militia” and accused them of being supported by foreign nations. Eyewitness accounts from Khartoum indicate that significant confrontations have persisted in multiple areas over the past several days, which raises concerns about the stability of the region and the potential repercussions for international diplomatic relations.
The ongoing conflict in Sudan has been marked by violence between the Sudanese military and the RSF, a paramilitary group. This turmoil has resulted in widespread accusations surrounding foreign involvement and support for both sides. The UAE’s relationship with the RSF has been particularly scrutinized, with claims of military aid surfacing amidst the conflict, further complicating Sudan’s socio-political landscape. The diplomatic ramifications of such interactions can have far-reaching effects, especially with accusations involving the targeting of diplomatic premises, which are protected under international law.
In summary, the recent allegations between the Sudanese army and the UAE highlight the intense conflict dynamics in Sudan, exacerbated by claims of foreign involvement and the targeting of diplomatic spaces. The situation remains precarious, with intense street fighting ongoing and both nations standing firm in their views regarding the incidents in Khartoum. This confrontation underscores the complicated web of local and international politics that characterize the Sudanese crisis.
Original Source: www.news24.com
