Iraq Condemns Attack on UAE Diplomatic Mission in Sudan
The Iraqi Foreign Ministry condemned the attack on the UAE’s diplomatic mission in Sudan, reaffirming the necessity to respect diplomatic sanctity as per international law. The UAE claims the attack resulted from an aircraft belonging to the Sudanese army, while the Sudanese army denies these allegations, attributing the act to rebel groups, thereby complicating the conflict situation in Sudan.
On Tuesday, the Iraqi Foreign Ministry issued a statement condemning the recent attack on the United Arab Emirates (UAE) ambassador’s residence located in Khartoum, Sudan. The ministry firmly expressed its disapproval of any breach of international laws and protocols, reiterating the importance of respecting the integrity of diplomatic missions and guaranteeing their protection as stipulated in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The incident, which occurred on Sunday, involved an aircraft, allegedly from the Sudanese army, targeting the UAE’s diplomatic headquarters in Khartoum, resulting in considerable damage and labeling the event as a “brutal attack” by UAE officials. In turn, the Sudanese army refuted these allegations, declaring that it does not conduct attacks on foreign diplomatic premises or international organization locations. Furthermore, the army asserted, “The military does not use these locations as military bases or loot their contents. Such shameful and cowardly acts are carried out by the militia of the rebel Dagalo group [RSF group, commanded by General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo,] supported by countries known to the world, and continue to occur in the sight and hearing of international nations and organizations.”
The attack on the UAE diplomatic mission in Sudan has raised significant concerns about the safety of diplomatic entities operating within volatile regions. Violations of diplomatic sanctity not only threaten the welfare of diplomatic personnel but also undermine the established norms of international relations as outlined by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which serves to protect diplomatic missions from aggression. This incident highlights the precarious security situation in Sudan, where ongoing conflict has escalated tensions between various factions, creating an environment where diplomatic protections may be compromised. Additionally, it stresses the need for accountability in the face of such acts, especially when national armies are involved in disputes regarding the legitimacy of their operations.
The condemnation from Iraq underscores the international community’s intolerance for attacks on diplomatic missions, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to international law. This incident may serve as a catalyst for further diplomatic discussions surrounding the protection of embassies and the accountability of state and non-state actors involved in conflicts. The Sudanese army’s denial suggests a complex environment where narratives from various factions may clash, complicating the already fragile situation in Sudan. It further illustrates the need for robust mechanisms to ensure the security of diplomatic missions globally.
Original Source: shafaq.com
