Ghana’s Democracy: A Politics of Promises, Says Professor Bokpin
Professor Godfred Bokpin critiques Ghana’s political landscape as one characterized by empty promises, cautioning voters about the unlikelihood of political parties fulfilling their electoral pledges due to financial constraints. He specifically highlights the limitations of the Free SHS policy, which, while increasing enrollment, has failed to ensure educational quality. As the 2024 elections approach, he urges Ghanaians to remain vigilant against potential disappointments.
In a recent interview, Professor Godfred Bokpin of the University of Ghana Business School articulated a critical perspective on Ghana’s democratic framework, describing it as fundamentally rooted in a “politics of promises.” As the nation approaches the 2024 elections, political parties are actively presenting their manifestos, which have ignited extensive debates among voters. Notably, former President John Dramani Mahama’s “24 Hour-economy” initiative has emerged as a focal point of discussion. Professor Bokpin emphasized the dissonance between the ambitious pledges made by political entities and the stark financial realities that render such promises often unfeasible. He urged Ghanaians to remain vigilant against the potential heartbreak associated with unmet expectations from these political commitments. He stated, “Our democracy is one of a politics of promises… Ghanaians should be very careful because disappointment lies ahead. We don’t have the fiscal space to implement a number of the proposals that the political parties have put out there. They cannot, and they know.” Additionally, the professor criticized the Free Senior High School (SHS) policy, acknowledging its role in elevating enrollment rates but questioning the quality of education it has facilitated. He remarked, “We may have checked the box in terms of quantity. But that alone is not sufficient,” highlighting the need for a balanced consideration of both access and quality in educational reform.
The discourse surrounding democracy in Ghana has illuminated a prevailing concern regarding the integrity and feasibility of political promises. With the approach of elections, politicians frequently propose extensive initiatives that captivate the populace. However, this commentary reflects a broader skepticism about the practical execution of these promises, particularly in light of financial constraints impacting the government’s ability to fulfill such commitments. The educational policy of Free SHS is emblematic of this concern, provoking discussions about the quality versus the quantity of education access in Ghana.
In conclusion, Professor Godfred Bokpin’s insights present a sobering critique of Ghana’s political landscape, underscoring a persistent gap between the promises made by politicians and the practical realities of governance. His cautionary stance serves as a call for voters to maintain awareness regarding the feasibility of electoral pledges. The ongoing discourse invites further scrutiny into both the political process and the impact of policies such as Free SHS on the quality of education in the country.
Original Source: www.ghanaweb.com
