Erdogan’s Ambitions in Post-Assad Syria: A Risky Vision for Turkey

President Erdogan believes Turkey is the leading power in post-Assad Syria, aiming for control of reconstruction projects and Kurdish factions. His grand claims, however, pose significant risks, indicating a detachment from the realities of the region’s complex dynamics.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey has fostered the belief that his country possesses unrivaled dominance and influence over Syria in the aftermath of Bashar Assad’s regime. He has articulated ambitious aspirations, envisioning not only Turkish control over reconstruction efforts but also the empowerment to quell or even co-opt Kurdish groups within the country. Despite these lofty claims, such ambitions carry significant risks, potentially imperiling Turkey’s regional standing and exacerbating tensions within Syria. Erdogan’s worldview appears increasingly detached from the complexities of the current situation, raising questions about the sustainability of Turkey’s involvement in post-Assad Syria.

The ongoing conflict in Syria, which intensified over a decade ago, has deeply altered the geopolitical landscape of the region. Following the Assad regime’s severe decline in authority, various entities have vied for influence and control in the aftermath. Turkey, under President Erdogan, perceives an opportunity to capitalize on the regime’s weakened state by asserting itself as a preeminent power, especially in northern Syria where it seeks to expand its territorial and political reach. This ambition, however, may not align with the realities on the ground.

In summary, while President Erdogan harbors grand ambitions regarding Turkey’s role in a post-Assad Syria, these aspirations highlight a potential disconnect from the operational and political realities. The pursuit of influence may provoke unnecessary complications for Turkey, raising concerns about the feasibility of Erdogan’s goals amidst a volatile and evolving situation in Syria. As the dynamics of power shift, prudent policy decisions will be essential to avoid overreach and ensure regional stability.

Original Source: www.haaretz.com