South Sudan’s Social Media Ban Draws Criticism from Journalists and Advocates
South Sudan has implemented a social media ban to curb unrest following protests related to violence in Sudan. The Committee to Protect Journalists criticized this action as excessive censorship, hampering journalistic efforts. Journalists are using virtual private networks to continue working but remain uncertain about their audience’s access to news. The authorities may reconsider the ban within 72 hours, amid ongoing unrest and curfews in Juba.
South Sudan has blocked access to social media platforms amid concerns regarding press freedom. In a directive issued on January 22, the National Communication Authority instructed internet service providers to restrict access for a period ranging from 30 to 90 days. This step aims to limit the dissemination of footage depicting violence related to recent protests sparked by killings of South Sudanese nationals in Sudan.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) condemned the government’s action, labeling it a severe act of censorship that hampers journalistic efforts and deprives the public of vital news sources. Muthoki Mumo, the CPJ Africa program coordinator, stated, “Blocking social media access is a blanket act of censorship and a disproportionate response to unrest that makes it difficult for journalists to do their jobs.”
Journalists in South Sudan face challenges under the social media ban, with many resorting to virtual private networks to perform their duties. However, they express doubt about whether their audience is receiving their reports. Mariak Bol, editor-in-chief of Hot in Juba, remarked, “We journalists are using VPNs to work. What we don’t know is whether our audience is receiving [our news].”
In addition to the social media restrictions, authorities have imposed a curfew in the capital, Juba, effective January 17, as part of broader measures to restore order. The director general of the National Communication Authority indicated that the ban might be lifted within 72 hours, yet no official statement has been confirmed. Attempts to contact South Sudan’s information minister for clarification have proven unsuccessful.
The recent social media blockage in South Sudan is a response to escalating unrest highlighted by violent protests triggered by killings of South Sudanese nationals in Sudan. The government’s decision reflects a broader pattern of limiting public discourse during times of crisis. As journalists strive to inform the public, restrictions on media access significantly challenge their operations and threaten the free flow of information.
The blocking of social media in South Sudan represents a critical threat to press freedom and public access to information. As journalists struggle to navigate this challenging environment, it is essential for authorities to reconsider such restrictions to foster an open and informed society. Urgent dialogues concerning press rights must be prioritized to ensure that such acts of censorship do not persist.
Original Source: punchng.com
