Rethinking Israel’s Security Strategy: The Need to Prioritize Gaza over Iran
The article critiques Israel’s current security strategy that prioritizes Iran while viewing Hamas as deterred. It argues that Hamas represents a distinct ideological threat that requires immediate focus, particularly following the events of October 7. The author emphasizes that the struggle against radical ideology is paramount and must take precedence in military and political strategy, underscoring the need for decisive action in Gaza.
The assumption that “Hamas is deterred” has long been ingrained within Israeli security perceptions, including among members of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. This viewpoint, which stems from a neo-Marxist perspective considering socio-economic factors, has led to a fundamental misunderstanding of Hamas as a predominantly ideological enemy driven by identity and religion. Despite the horrific events of October 7, this flawed notion persists, indicating a refusal to accurately recognize and confront the true nature of the threat posed by Hamas.
Currently, the Israeli strategic outlook prioritizes Iran as the central enemy based on the concept of the “Head of the Snake.” This doctrine suggests that by eliminating Iran, all other threats will dissipate, leading to a transformed Middle East. Key security discussions posit that efforts and resources should be disproportionately focused on countering Iranian influence without adequately addressing the significant and imminent dangers that Hamas poses locally.
The Iranian leadership, however, does not view the nation as paramount; rather, they aim for a global jihadist victory that transcends national identity. The ideology underpinning the Iranian regime is designed to persist even if the state itself collapses. This indicates that the ideological battle constitutes the core threat, transcending any single state or organization.
Therefore, the immediate and principal threat to Israel—and the broader world—manifests itself in radical ideology rather than military might. The urgency post-October 7 necessitates a shift in focus from Iran back to Gaza, as it represents a definitive test of the West’s ability to counter radical Islamic ideology. Success in Gaza is essential, as failure could signal broader repercussions, diminishing Western resolve against radicalism.
Moreover, Hamas embodies an immediate existential threat with aspirations to conquer and destroy Israel, whereas the implications of Iranian missile attacks can be countered with military responses. The actions witnessed in Gaza could easily be replicated across other nations, suggesting a regional systemic threat that demands a robust military presence capable of establishing territorial control, akin to historical actions against fascism.
Regrettably, current Israeli leadership appears to be misaligned, retreating from the Gaza front lines, which undermines strategic stability. The ongoing dialogues between Israeli and American leaders risk perpetuating the focus on Iran and Saudi Arabia while neglecting the pressing threat posed by radical ideologies and the groups that espouse them. The need for a decisive and clear strategy must rest on the recognition that the path to real victory necessitates confronting the ideological adversary directly with resolve and might.
The article discusses the prevailing strategies and misconceptions regarding security threats facing Israel, particularly concerning Hamas and Iran. The framing of Hamas as deterred is critiqued, as it reflects a misunderstanding of the group’s ideological motivations. The discourse suggests a need to reassess the prioritization of threats, emphasizing the importance of addressing radical ideologies that propel groups such as Hamas. It also places Gaza as a significant battleground in the broader fight against radical Islamic extremism, arguing that failure here can undermine Western credibility worldwide.
In summary, Israel’s current strategic focus on Iran distracts from the urgent need to confront Hamas, which poses a direct existential threat. The ideological roots of radicalism must be recognized as the principal enemy, and victory in Gaza is critical for demonstrating resolve against such extremism. Only by addressing these realities can Israel hope to achieve lasting security and stability in the region.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
