Trump Considers Cutting Aid to Jordan and Egypt Over Gaza Resettlement Plan
![77523ffd-2766-4d90-9768-44bfe9f714e6](https://globalsouth.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/77523ffd-2766-4d90-9768-44bfe9f714e6.jpg)
President Trump indicated he may withhold aid from Jordan and Egypt if they do not accept his plan to relocate Palestinians from Gaza. He stated that the Palestinians would not have the right to return once displaced. Both countries have previously opposed this proposal, raising concerns over its ethical implications.
President Donald Trump announced on Monday that he might consider reducing aid to Jordan and Egypt if they refuse to accept his proposal to resettle the Palestinian population of Gaza within their borders. This ultimatum places considerable pressure on these key regional allies to endorse his controversial plan for the territorial redevelopment of Gaza, which involves relocating the approximately two million Palestinians living there.
During a press conference in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump affirmed that the Palestinians would not retain any right to return to their homeland following its redevelopment. He expressed confidence in negotiating potential arrangements with Jordan and Egypt, despite their prior rejections of the idea of integrating Palestinian refugees into their societies.
The assertion by Mr. Trump has drawn criticism, with some experts labeling the forced relocation of Palestinians as potentially equivalent to ethnic cleansing or a war crime. In an interview broadcasted on Fox News, he stated unequivocally, “No, they wouldn’t,” when asked if displaced Palestinians could return to Gaza after the proposed reconstruction projects were completed. This has sparked considerable debate regarding the ethical implications of his proposals and the potential consequences for regional stability.
In summary, President Trump has threatened to cut financial aid to Jordan and Egypt if they do not acquiesce to his plan for resettling Gaza’s Palestinian population. His remarks emphasize a controversial stance that disregards the right of return for these individuals, raising significant human rights concerns. The international community is closely monitoring these developments as they could have far-reaching implications for Middle Eastern geopolitics.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com