Marco Rubio Skips G20 Meeting, Criticizes South Africa’s Policies

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will not attend the G20 foreign ministers’ meeting in South Africa, criticizing its policies as anti-American. His absence reflects a broader disengagement from international cooperation under the Trump administration. South Africa’s G20 presidency aims to address issues for poorer nations but is at odds with U.S. priorities. Analysts believe progress is still possible despite limited U.S. participation.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has decided to forego attending the G20 foreign ministers’ meeting hosted by South Africa due to his criticism of the country’s policies, which he deems anti-American. Rubio is returning to the United States following discussions with Russian officials regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine. His absence denotes not only a lack of support for the meeting but also a reflection of the Trump administration’s apathetic stance toward international cooperation.

The South African G20 presidency, which aims to advance the interests of poorer nations and address climate change, contrasts with Rubio’s perspectives. He previously declared on social media that he will also not attend the main G20 summit later this year, asserting that South Africa intends to utilize the gathering for promoting diversity and inclusivity agendas. By stating, “My job is to advance America’s national interests, not waste taxpayer money or coddle anti-Americanism,” Rubio emphasizes his commitment to U.S. priorities.

This decision further illustrates the strain in relations between the United States and South Africa, traditionally viewed as a key trade partner. Recent U.S. executive actions have implicated South Africa in discriminatory practices regarding land laws and anti-American foreign policies, straining diplomatic ties. Despite Rubio’s absence, South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola remarked that the U.S. representation would still occur in some capacity at the G20 meeting.

Even with lessened American engagement, analysts suggest that significant progress may still be achievable during South Africa’s presidency. It is noted by international observers that while the U.S. maintains its influence, other nations, including the EU, Russia, and China, have voiced their support for the host country’s leadership. Kaja Kallas, the EU’s foreign policy chief, emphasized the importance of inclusivity and multilateralism as the world faces growing threats to collaborative efforts.

In summary, Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s decision to skip the G20 meeting illustrates a critical shift in U.S.-South Africa relations, highlighting a broader trend of disengagement from multilateral forums. The themes set by South Africa for its G20 presidency contradict Rubio’s assertions of advancing American interests. Despite this, analysts believe that the G20 can still achieve meaningful outcomes, even in the absence of strong U.S. leadership. This situation underscores the complex dynamics of international diplomacy and cooperation.

Original Source: apnews.com