Sudan’s Antiwar Coalition Splinters: A Shift Towards Reinvention and Neutrality
Sudan’s major antiwar coalition, Taqaddum, split on February 10, 2024, due to differing views on partnering with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). A faction known as Taasis formed with RSF, while traditional leaders created Somoud to preserve neutrality. Somoud seeks to engage more deeply with civilians, distancing itself from Taqaddum’s controversial alignment with RSF, amid persistent humanitarian crises in the country.
The Taqaddum coalition, Sudan’s most significant antiwar group, fractured on February 10, 2024, due to differences over aligning with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a contentious military faction involved in Sudan’s ongoing war. This division resulted in the formation of Taasis, a faction positioned with the RSF, contrasting with the smaller, neutral coalition of traditional leaders named Somoud.
Originally established in October 2023, Taqaddum comprised armed movements, political entities, and civil society activists, led by Abdalla Hamdok, a former prime minister. The coalition’s credibility diminished after some members supported the RSF’s new governance framework, disproportionally represented by armed groups needing state validation, as noted by analysts.
Hamdok and others opting out of RSF cooperation formed Somoud, which aims to uphold its independence. Analysts argue political parties avoid complicity by not cooperating with the RSF, which has been labeled genocidal in the context of its prior transgressions in the Darfur region.
Taqaddum’s involvement in diplomatic agreements with the RSF raised concerns among international observers, impacting its public perception negatively. In particular, the Declaration of Principles signed in early January 2024 raised alarms that Taqaddum was downplaying RSF’s previous violations during the conflict.
Post-split, experts view Somoud’s distancing from the RSF as a potential advantage, allowing them to cultivate a stronger connection with the public. While smaller than Taqaddum, Somoud’s perceived integrity might position it favorably in future political dialogues, contingent on outreach efforts and community engagement.
Despite ongoing challenges and the recent accusations against Taqaddum reflecting RSF sympathies, Somoud has asserted its commitment to outreach and political neutrality. Somoud’s spokesperson contends that allegations against Taqaddum constitute a strategic smear campaign orchestrated by the army to undermine previous coalition efforts.
The situation entails complex dynamics within the country, where civilians express disappointment in the RSF and favor the stabilization provided by the army. However, allegations against the army regarding reprisal actions complicate public sentiment, highlighting the need for careful navigation in the evolving political landscape of Sudan.
In conclusion, the division of the Taqaddum coalition into Taasis and Somoud signifies a critical turning point in Sudan’s antiwar efforts. While Taasis aligns with the military faction RSF, Somoud strives to maintain neutrality and reconnect with the populace. Moving forward, Somoud’s proactive outreach and commitment to addressing local realities will be crucial in re-establishing credibility amid a tumultuous political backdrop.
Original Source: www.aljazeera.com
