Jordan’s Strategic Role in Curbing Israeli Expansionism in Southern Syria
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dea94/dea94bef060d20b7cd8a311c1ae9aa4c43ccc790" alt="a170dd9b-09eb-4721-a9f8-b429b8a8235f"
Jordan has issued minimal media coverage regarding Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s visit, where King Abdullah condemned Israeli airstrikes and supported Syria’s territorial integrity. The visit comes amid Israeli concerns over HTS’s presence in southern Syria. The need for Jordan’s involvement in stabilizing southern Syria raises significant questions about its strategic interests and security, especially in the context of Israeli expansionism.
Jordan’s official media outlets have reported minimally on the visit of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa to Amman. Following the meeting, King Abdullah condemned Israeli airstrikes in Syria and reaffirmed Jordan’s support for Syria’s territorial integrity while advocating for the voluntary return of Syrian refugees. However, Jordanian media did not emphasize discussions surrounding Israel’s occupation in southern Syria, the military dynamics in the region, or relations with the Druze community—issues critical to Sharaa’s visit.
The backdrop of Sharaa’s visit was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s assertion that Israel would prevent the ruling group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) from establishing a presence in southern Syria. Israeli officials have indicated a commitment to ensuring the rights and safety of Druze and Alawite communities, hinting at an agenda that could lead to the fragmentation of Syria into sectarian statelets, a scenario favored by some factions within Israeli politics.
Syria’s future is being shaped amidst sensitive discussions, particularly regarding southern Syria. Jordanian sources suggest that the topic surfaced in meetings between Jordanian and Turkish officials, particularly following the fall of the Assad regime. The Jordanian Crown Prince Hussein bin Abdullah’s recent meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan likely included advice to Sharaa about coordinating efforts in southern Syria, with a focus on the Druze community and Israel’s regional objectives.
A pressing question arises regarding Jordan’s willingness to engage actively in southern Syria if there is a request from HTS, which may include influencing the Druze, stabilizing Daraa, or establishing a military presence near the Syria-Israel border. Such actions could counter Israel’s narrative of insecurity linked to HTS and bolster efforts to maintain Syrian territorial integrity while also enhancing Jordan’s strategic interests.
Historically, Jordan has refrained from military involvement in Syria; however, the current context may necessitate a reconsideration. A Jordanian role could be pivotal in maintaining stability in the region, particularly concerning relations with supportive communities and facilitating the return of refugees. This would also help secure access to vital water sources, a significant concern for Jordan.
Jordan enjoys amicable relations with various communities in southern Syria, particularly among the Druze and Arab tribes, presenting an opportunity for collaboration with Damascus to resist Israeli encroachments. Although Jordan has traditionally avoided foreign military entanglements, such involvement could be justified through agreements with Syria and support from Turkey and others in the region.
Time is of the essence. If King Abdullah and Sharaa did not discuss Jordan’s potential engagement in southern Syria during their recent meeting, it is imperative to expedite these discussions, even if through channels involving Turkey. Addressing these matters promptly is crucial to counteract the narratives promoted by certain political factions in the U.S., framing HTS in a negative light and suggesting risks to minority groups within Syria.
Inaction or delayed response from Jordan could lead to significant consequences that would affect both Syria and Jordan’s national security. The complexity of the situation necessitates a proactive stance to safeguard regional stability and address the growing concerns stemming from Israeli expansionism in Syria.
In summary, Jordan faces critical decisions regarding its involvement in southern Syria, especially in light of Israel’s expansionist policies. King Abdullah’s condemnation of Israeli actions and support for Syrian territorial integrity lay the groundwork for potential Jordanian action. By leveraging relationships with local communities and collaborating with regional allies, Jordan could play a crucial role in ensuring stability and safeguarding its national interests. Immediate and proactive engagement is essential to address the evolving challenges in southern Syria.
Original Source: www.middleeasteye.net