Palestinian Authority Condemns Qatar’s “National Conference for Palestine”

The “National Conference for Palestine” in Qatar incited backlash from the Palestinian Authority, accusing it of undermining the PLO. While promoting a diverse leadership, there were notable Hamas affiliations and support for militant figures, leading to accusations of betrayal. The event reflects significant rifts within Palestinian leadership aspirations amid claims of PLO marginalization since the Oslo Accords.
The recent “National Conference for Palestine,” hosted by Doha, has drawn heavy criticism from the Palestinian Authority and its supporters. Critics accuse the organizers of attempting to undermine the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) while labeling the event a platform for specific Palestinian factions. The conference was touted as a collaborative effort by influential Palestinian figures aiming to rebuild the PLO on democratic grounds and establish unified leadership. However, it faced backlash regarding its ties to Hamas and the implications of its agenda.
Notably, the conference included non-Hamas entities, such as Mustafa Barghouti from the National Palestinian Initiative, yet still presented an undertone of Hamas affiliation. Key figures associated with Hamas, like Adnan Hmeidan of the Popular Conference for Palestinians Abroad, were present. Furthermore, representatives linked to Hamas, including Ziad Elaloul and Osama Abuirshaid, were seated prominently during the opening ceremony, raising concerns over the conference’s true intentions.
The proceedings also featured support for individuals regarded as terrorists, with messages lauding imprisoned members of militant groups. The event’s organizers claimed that the PLO has been marginalized since the Oslo Accords and criticized the Palestinian Authority for being unable to act independently under Israeli occupation. They emphasized a need for a leadership structure that includes resistance movements like Hamas.
Participants asserted the right of Palestinians to resist and aimed to create a unified leadership rather than propose specific solutions to the conflict. However, the conference was perceived as a significant betrayal by supporters of the Palestinian Authority, leading to the publication of derogatory representations and reports that the PA restricted attendees from traveling to Doha. Detractors have characterized the event as one where traitors gathered, ultimately questioning the legitimacy of the gathering and its potential impact on Palestinian unity.
The “National Conference for Palestine” reflects deep divisions within Palestinian politics, igniting anger from the Palestinian Authority regarding perceived attempts to sideline the PLO. While organizers professed a mission to unify Palestinian leadership and include diverse factions, critics identified strong connections to Hamas and a troubling endorsement of militant figures. This conflict exemplifies the challenges facing Palestinian political discourse and the struggle for leadership in the context of Israeli occupation.
Original Source: www.jpost.com