Syria’s Sharaa Critiques Israeli Aggression as Expansionist
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa claimed that Israeli military actions reflect “expansionist intentions,” occurring amidst the instability following the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. His remarks during an Arab summit addressed Israel’s continued occupation of the Golan Heights and its numerous airstrikes targeting Syrian military installations. Sharaa’s statements emphasize regional tensions and the complexities of international relations, particularly following political upheaval in Syria.
Ahmed al-Sharaa, the Syrian President, characterized Israel’s military actions in Syria as indicative of its “expansionist intentions.” During an emergency Arab summit held in Egypt, he remarked that Israel’s assaults exploit the current instability in the region, presenting them as necessary for security while pursuing territorial ambitions. He refrained from disclosing any potential responses from Syria to Israeli aggression, implying the need for strategic planning.
Sharaa’s statements came during his first appearance at the Arab summit since the recent political upheaval that toppled Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December. Following Assad’s regime’s decline, Israel has intensified its occupation of the Golan Heights by encroaching on a demilitarized buffer zone, which contradicts terms set by the 1974 disengagement agreement between Syria and Israel. In addition, Israel has conducted numerous airstrikes targeting various military facilities throughout Syria, including advanced weapon systems.
Assad, who had governed Syria for nearly 25 years, departed to Russia following the seizure of Damascus by anti-regime forces on December 8, which marked the end of the Baath Party’s longstanding authority since 1963. Sharaa’s statements and concerns highlight the fragile security dynamics in the region, indicative of ongoing tensions and the complex interplay of international relations following regime changes and conflict.
In summary, President Ahmed al-Sharaa articulated concerns regarding Israeli military actions, framing them as expansive and opportunistic amid Syria’s political turmoil. His statements reflect an overarching concern regarding territorial sovereignty and regional stability, particularly in the context of Israel’s increased aggression following the fall of the Assad regime. Sharaa’s cautious approach towards potential responses indicates the need for strategic considerations amidst ongoing conflicts.
Original Source: www.aa.com.tr
