Sudan Accuses UAE of Breaching Genocide Convention by Supporting Rebels
Sudan has filed a case at the International Court of Justice against the UAE, accusing it of violating the genocide convention by supporting the paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces in Sudan’s conflict. The complaint details serious allegations of human rights abuses by the RSF against the Masalit people. Sudan seeks urgent measures to prevent further violence, amid a conflict that has resulted in over 24,000 deaths and millions displaced.
Sudan has brought a case to the International Court of Justice, accusing the United Arab Emirates of violating the genocide convention by supporting the paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces (RSF) involved in the ongoing Sudanese conflict. The court revealed this information on Thursday, stating that the complaint details severe acts allegedly committed by the RSF and its affiliates, including genocide, murder, theft, rape, forced displacement, trespassing, vandalism, and human rights violations specifically against the Masalit population.
The allegations suggest that the UAE plays a complicit role in these crimes by providing considerable financial, political, and military assistance to the RSF militia. As a part of its filing, Sudan has requested the court to implement urgent provisional measures, demanding that the UAE take necessary actions to avert further violence and atrocities against the Masalit people.
The conflict in Sudan escalated in April 2023, following heightened tensions between the military and the RSF in the capital, Khartoum. This violence has claimed over 24,000 lives and displaced more than 14 million individuals, with approximately 3.2 million fleeing to neighboring nations. The case was filed shortly after the RSF and its allies initiated a charter to establish a parallel government in light of recent military advances by the Sudanese army.
The Conflict Observatory, monitored by the U.S. State Department, claims to have spotted flights transporting arms from the UAE to the RSF. These operations reportedly occurred at Chad’s Aéroport International Maréchal Idriss Deby, which the UAE has alleged involved medical support for a local hospital. In January, the U.S. Treasury imposed sanctions on the RSF leader and affiliated companies, amidst assertions that the group has committed genocide.
Despite ongoing allegations, the UAE has denied claims of arming the RSF, though evidence suggests otherwise. The historical context of the conflict, rooted in the long-standing violence in regions like Darfur, resembles past atrocities that led to mass displacement and loss of life. The legal processes of the International Court of Justice are expected to unfold over several years, and their decisions are binding in nature.
In conclusion, Sudan’s case against the UAE highlights significant allegations of complicity in genocide through support of the RSF. The ongoing conflict in Sudan has resulted in catastrophic humanitarian consequences, warranting urgent intervention. As the situation develops, the International Court of Justice’s forthcoming rulings may have profound implications for both Sudan and the UAE amid the continuing struggle for resolution in the region.
Original Source: www.independent.co.uk
