Kenya’s Diplomatic Controversy: Accusations of Supporting RSF in Sudan

Kenya’s actions towards the RSF have led Sudan to accuse it of supporting a rogue entity responsible for human rights violations. The RSF’s involvement in a civil war has prompted international sanctions, yet Kenya claims neutrality. This situation has led to increased scrutiny and potential isolation for Kenya on the global stage, raising significant human rights concerns and criticisms from various international bodies.

The diplomatic relations between Sudan and Kenya have been strained following recent actions involving Kenyan Vice President Kithure Kindiki and Mohamed Hamdan “Hemedti” Dagalo, the RSF militia leader. The United Nations has accused the RSF of severe human rights violations in Sudan, which prompted Sudan to label Kenya’s engagement with the RSF as an “irresponsible stance,” leading to Sudan’s recall of its ambassador and an assertion that Kenya now fits the description of a rogue state.

The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese army have been embroiled in a civil conflict since April 2023, resulting in countless deaths and over 12.5 million individuals displaced. The United States and the United Nations imposed sanctions on both factions due to their involvement in these violent acts. In February 2024, the RSF convened in Nairobi to establish a parallel governance structure, an action that received widespread condemnation from multiple international stakeholders.

In response to accusations of partiality towards the RSF, Kenya asserted its position of neutrality, claiming a commitment to peace facilitation in the region. Kenya’s stance, however, has drawn criticism from the U.S. State Department and the U.N. Security Council, both of which expressed significant concern regarding the creation of a parallel government by the RSF, stating that such actions jeopardize stability in Sudan and exacerbate Kenya’s isolation internationally.

Kenya’s role in regional conflicts stretches beyond Sudan, as evidenced by its hosting of M23 rebel group members amidst accusations of atrocities in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Strong diplomatic repercussions followed, including a recall of the DRC’s ambassador and expulsion of Kenyan military personnel, alongside a boycott of a summit led by Kenyan President William Ruto.

Human rights organizations continue to scrutinize Kenya for alleged violations of international human rights standards, particularly involving the abduction of opposition figures and asylum seekers. Incidents like the abduction of Ugandan opposition leader Kizza Besigye, who faced charges upon return to Uganda, and the deportation of asylum seekers to Turkey have raised alarm over Kenya’s adherence to international laws.

In summation, Kenya, previously viewed as a mediator in continental disputes, faces mounting allegations of engaging in conflicts. Its actions in Sudan and the DRC illustrate a shift away from neutrality, alongside an alarming human rights record that questions the nation’s commitment to international standards. Many analysts now suggest that Kenya’s actions might categorize it as a rogue state, markedly distanced from established diplomatic and human rights norms.

Kenya’s recent diplomatic engagements are indicative of a shift in its international standing, transitioning from a perceived mediator to a state accused of partisan behavior in conflicts. Its relationship with the RSF and hosting of controversial entities illustrate a departure from neutrality, raising significant human rights concerns. As criticisms mount, Kenya risks growing isolation and condemnation as a rogue state, underscoring the need for a reassessment of its foreign policy and adherence to international norms.

Original Source: www.voanews.com