The Lingering Impacts of Duterte’s War on Drugs and His Arrest
The arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte highlights the ongoing impact of his ‘war on drugs,’ during which thousands were killed. Charged with crimes against humanity by the ICC, Duterte’s detention is viewed favorably by human rights advocates, though concerns about ongoing dangers for activists persist. His policies, alongside the current administration’s stance, continue to threaten the safety of human rights defenders and complicate the potential for positive change in societal activism.
The recent arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte marks a significant moment in the ongoing consequences of his controversial “war on drugs,” which defined his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Duterte faced charges from the International Criminal Court (ICC) for alleged crimes against humanity related to this brutal campaign, which reportedly led to the deaths of thousands of individuals. Upon returning from Hong Kong, he was quickly detained and transported to The Hague, signaling a potential turning point for justice in the Philippines.
Duterte has staunchly defended his anti-drug policies, showing “no apologies” for the resulting extrajudicial killings. While his allies decry his arrest as “unlawful” due to the Philippines’ withdrawal from the ICC in 2019, the court maintains jurisdiction for events prior to this exit. Human rights advocates view his detention as a positive sign for victims, indicating that powerful figures can be held accountable under international law. \n
The ICC’s investigation stems from allegations of widespread human rights abuses during Duterte’s administration, including a death toll that some organizations estimate could reach as high as 20,000. This includes a United Nations report revealing at least 73 children among the victims of this violence. The ICC’s mandate allows it to prosecute severe crimes when national authorities are either unwilling or unable to do so, reinforcing the importance of international oversight in protecting human rights.
Notably, Duterte is the first former Asian leader to be issued an arrest warrant from the ICC, with potential implications for historical justice in the region. His violent campaign against drugs not only resulted in numerous fatalities but also threatened the safety of human rights defenders, particularly in environmental sectors. The war on drugs fostered a culture of impunity where dissent against the government was met with violence.
Given the circumstances, experts question whether Duterte’s arrest will lead to improved conditions for human rights defenders in the Philippines. Despite the arrest, many activists believe risks persist, particularly since the current administration’s support for extractive industries exacerbates vulnerabilities. Furthermore, recent Duterte-era policies remain in place, enabling targeted actions against activists regarding their opposition to various projects. The interconnectedness of mining, legal frameworks, and extractive policy practices creates a precarious environment for advocates.
The potential impacts of Duterte’s arrest on the civic space for environmental defenders remain unclear. While some advocate for a reevaluation of harmful policies, others express skepticism due to ongoing risks associated with government quasi-military operations targeting activists. As human rights professor Gregorio Bueta notes, the arrest may not immediately improve conditions for advocacy, but it sends a vital message that accountability exists and justice will prevail through lawful means in the Philippines.
Duterte’s arrest represents a crucial development in the landscape of human rights and justice in the Philippines, highlighting the enduring impacts of his war on drugs. While his detention may inspire hope for victims and advocates, the underlying structures that perpetuate violence against human rights defenders remain in place. Experts underscore the necessity of evolving laws and removing detrimental policies to truly foster a safer environment for civic engagement and environmental protection. Therefore, while there is a signal toward accountability, the reality on the ground continues to require vigilant advocacy and reform.
Original Source: www.eco-business.com
