Lebanon and Israel Engage in US-Sponsored Talks on Border Disputes

Lebanon and Israel have commenced US-mediated indirect talks to resolve border disputes, forming committees to discuss issues arising from the 2006 conflict. These negotiations, however, are not seen as moves toward normalization. Key topics include the release of prisoners and occupied territories, while Israel’s military presence in southern Lebanon remains contentious.

Recent reports indicate that Lebanon and Israel have initiated US-sponsored indirect talks aimed at addressing their longstanding border dispute. Sources emphasized that this agreement, which establishes three negotiation committees, is not a precursor to normalization between the two nations. Rather, it is a step toward implementing Resolution 1701, specifically focusing on discussing unresolved border issues from 2006, as well as discussing prisoners held by both sides.

These committees are distinguished from direct negotiations, with a clear objective to tackle outstanding matters, such as the five locations currently occupied by Israel post-war and the issue of detained individuals. An Israeli official had suggested that the negotiations could lead to normalization, stating the objective is to convey diplomatic intentions to Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.

Notably, on March 11, Israel released five Lebanese prisoners as a goodwill gesture in line with this US-mediated agreement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed that collaborative workgroups involving the US, France, and Lebanon will be formed to facilitate the resolution of border conflicts, including negotiating disputed territories along the Blue Line.

The ongoing border dispute encompasses thirteen contentious areas, including Ras al-Naqoura and Marwahin, and Israel’s failure to withdraw from various Lebanese territories following the 2006 war remains a significant point of contention. Additionally, Israel has been accused of continuing aggressive actions in southern Lebanon, thereby breaching UN Resolution 1701. The Israeli government defends these actions by asserting the necessity of preventing Hezbollah from rearming, despite the resolution stipulating that such military infrastructure must be dismantled by the Lebanese military south of the Litani River.

The recent US-sponsored talks between Lebanon and Israel mark an important attempt to resolve longstanding border disputes without proceeding toward normalization. The formation of committees aims to focus on pressing issues stemming from the 2006 conflict, including occupied territories and prisoners. However, Israel’s ongoing military actions in southern Lebanon and assertions about Hezbollah’s military capabilities continue to complicate the situation, underscoring the need for a peaceful and diplomatic resolution.

Original Source: thecradle.co