Druze Leader Rejects Agreement with Syrian Interim Government Amidst Divisions
Hikmat al-Hijri, the Druze community leader, rejects agreements with Syria’s interim government, labeling it “radical.” This follows the implementation of a new constitution and highlights division among Druze factions about engaging with Syrian authorities. In parallel, Turkish officials visited Damascus to discuss the integration of Kurdish forces into Syrian state institutions amid ongoing regional tensions.
Hikmat al-Hijri, the spiritual leader of the Syrian Druze community, has firmly rejected any agreement with what he termed the “radical” interim Syrian government. His remarks, made in a video circulated online, come in the wake of a newly implemented transitional constitution for Syria, to which he and other Druze leaders express strong opposition, aiming to preserve their community’s autonomy.
During a recent gathering in Suweida, al-Hijri stated, “There is no understanding or agreement with the existing government in Damascus, which is a radical government in every sense of the word.” He added that the government is subject to international justice, emphasizing that any leniency regarding this matter is unacceptable for the Syrian populace.
The Men of Dignity movement, the dominant Druze military faction, has entered an agreement that places its security forces under the authority of Syria’s interior ministry, allowing for the central government to appoint a governor for Suweida province. This development illustrates the complex landscape within the Druze community regarding responses to the Syrian conflict.
Responses among the Druze have varied. Some leaders have engaged with the new authorities and discussed potential reintegration into state institutions, while other factions remain wary of government members linked to militant Islamism. Ahmed al-Sharaa, the interim president, has attempted to assuage fears regarding Sunni sectarian governance, asserting that his administration aims to safeguard religious and ethnic minorities.
Recent violent events on the Syrian coast, where government forces reportedly killed numerous civilians in sectarian clashes, have heightened concerns and distrust among the Druze towards the regime. Israel has capitalized on this apprehension, presenting itself as a protector of the Druze and fostering separatist sentiments in Suweida, despite the majority of the Druze rejecting such moves.
In a separate development, Turkish officials undertook a surprise visit to Damascus to engage in discussions with the interim leadership. Notable figures such as Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and Defence Minister Yasar Guler convened with interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa. This visit coincided with eforths to establish a five-year political transition aimed at integrating Kurdish forces into state structures, marking a significant diplomatic engagement in the region.
The ongoing situation entails a significant division among the Druze community regarding their relationship with the Syrian government and the interim constitution. Hikmat al-Hijri’s outright dismissal of the radical regime contrasts with differing views within the community, as some factions pursue integration while others maintain their autonomy. Additionally, Turkey’s diplomatic efforts underscore the evolving political landscape in Syria, highlighting potential implications for Kurdish reintegration and minority representation. The intricate dynamics between Israel, Turkey, and various factions in Syria continue to shape the region’s future.
Original Source: www.newarab.com
