Iran’s Warning on Nuclear Development Amid US Threats

Iran warns it may pursue nuclear weapons if attacked by the US or Israel, prompted by threats from President Trump. Ali Larijani emphasized the ineffectiveness of military actions and highlighted the need for indirect negotiations. Iranian leaders reject direct talks unless the US addresses past actions, indicating a complex diplomatic landscape ahead.

An adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader has asserted that Iran would develop nuclear weapons if the US or Israel were to attack, citing recent threats from US President Donald Trump and Israel related to Iran’s nuclear activities. Ali Larijani emphasized that although Iran is committed to a religious edict against nuclear weapons, continued US aggression could change this stance, as “If the United States makes any mistake, Iran will be forced to pursue nuclear weapons due to pressure from its people.”

During his remarks, Larijani noted that military interventions against Iran would be ineffective in eliminating its nuclear program, stressing that such actions would lead to serious repercussions. He also highlighted that any indirect negotiations with the United States would focus on understanding mutual concessions concerning the nuclear issue.

In a recent interview, President Trump threatened significant military actions against Iran if negotiations over its nuclear program fail. He stated, “If they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing like they’ve never seen before,” implying ongoing discussions with Iranian officials, although further details were not provided.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian communicated that Iran had rejected direct negotiation proposals but remained open to indirect dialogue, emphasizing that trust must be rebuilt on the side of the United States. He reiterated that while Iran is not opposed to negotiations, it demands rectification of prior US policies before proceeding.

In conclusion, Iran’s leadership has signaled a readiness to pursue nuclear weapons if subjected to military threats by the US or Israel, stressing the importance of indirect negotiations to address mutual concerns. The situation remains tense, with both sides seemingly caught in a cycle of threats and cautious diplomacy. It is evident that trust must be established for any meaningful dialogue to take place.

Original Source: www.socialnews.xyz