Oman Mediates Iran-U.S. Nuclear Talks Amid Rising Tensions

Iran has initiated indirect nuclear talks with the U.S. via Oman, with Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi presenting Iran’s positions to facilitate negotiations. Despite tensions and accusations of bullying from the U.S., Aragchi expressed a desire for a fair agreement. The talks signify a significant shift in the stalled nuclear negotiations, with both sides urged to engage earnestly despite past grievances.
Amid escalating tensions and accusations of bullying from the United States, Iran has initiated a dialogue regarding its nuclear program through intermediaries in Oman. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi conveyed Tehran’s negotiation points to Omani Foreign Minister Badr Al-Busaidi, marking the beginning of indirect talks with Washington. Aragchi emphasized Iran’s desire for a fair agreement based on equality, indicating possibilities for constructive negotiations if the U.S. reciprocates the intention.
During their meeting in Muscat, Aragchi appreciated Oman’s facilitation of discussions on regional issues. He asserted that an equitable proposal might lead to a preliminary understanding necessary for serious negotiations, should the U.S. approach the talks with similar intentions. Al-Busaidi acknowledged the excellent bilateral relations between Oman and Iran, expressing gratitude for Oman’s role in hosting these significant discussions.
The Iranian delegation, led by Aragchi, arrived in Muscat to engage in the negotiations, which are expected to remain indirect, although a direct meeting between Aragchi and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff might occur. The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Ismail Baghaei, conveyed that this delegation aims to safeguard Iran’s dignity and national interests.
The talks represent a notable advancement in the protracted negotiations concerning Iran’s nuclear activities—ongoing since the U.S. withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2018. President Trump has issued new threats concerning military action against Iran, insisting upon a new deal to limit its nuclear capabilities, suggesting that failure to comply would result in severe consequences.
U.S. Envoy Witkoff has articulated that the administration’s primary objective is to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, though he noted the potential for alternative approaches to resolution. Meanwhile, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Majid Takht-Ravanchi, emphasized the need for dialogue free from U.S. intimidation, condemning any coercion in negotiations while asserting that Iran’s nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, contradicting Western suspicions of militarization.
In conclusion, Oman’s mediation in the Iran-U.S. nuclear discussions highlights the complexity of international negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear program. Both countries are confronting their positions amid mutual accusations, yet the talks signal a potential thaw in stagnant relations. As Iran seeks an equitable agreement, the efficacy of these negotiations will largely depend on the willingness of each party to engage constructively and address the primary concerns at stake.
Original Source: www.palestinechronicle.com