Sanjay Raut Critiques EVMs as Threat to Democracy in India
Sanjay Raut, of Shiv Sena (UBT), criticized electronic voting machines (EVMs) in his column, labeling them a threat to democracy in India. Citing examples of countries that have banned EVMs, he argued for a return to ballot paper voting. Raut claimed the recent assembly election results indicate systemic issues, particularly criticizing the Supreme Court’s support for EVMs and the inaction of Maharashtra’s current leadership.
Sanjay Raut, Member of Parliament and editor of the Shiv Sena (UBT) mouthpiece “Saamna,” expressed strong criticism of electronic voting machines (EVMs) in his Sunday column. He attributed the party’s disappointing performance in the recent assembly elections to the flaws inherent in EVMs, deeming them a significant hindrance to democracy in India. Raut referenced various countries that have banned EVMs, advocating for a return to traditional ballot paper voting, indicating that the preservation of democracy in India is contingent upon this shift.
In his article entitled ‘Shantata, EVM Garbhar Aahe’ (Silence, the EVM is pregnant), Raut cited the examples of nations like America, England, and Germany, all of which have either abandoned or deemed EVMs unsuitable for their electoral processes. He underscored incidents such as the Netherlands’ ban in 2006, Germany’s designation of EVM-initiated elections as fraudulent in 2009, and Japan’s transition to ballot paper in 2016 due to transparency concerns. Raut referenced comments from influential figures, including Elon Musk, who labeled EVMs as susceptible to manipulation. He further criticized the Supreme Court for its stance supporting EVMs, illustrating his disillusionment with the electoral integrity in India’s recent assembly elections.
Additional comments targeted former Chief Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud, accusing him of enabling what Raut perceives as an unconstitutional government in Maharashtra, thereby exacerbating the crisis in the region. He also remarked on the apparent delays in government formation by the current political leadership, asserting that this inaction is an affront to the electorate. Raut’s statements are part of a broader discontent within his party regarding the current electoral system and governance in Maharashtra.
The discussion surrounding electronic voting machines (EVMs) has gained traction in India, particularly after recent assembly elections where political parties have raised concerns about their reliability. Sanjay Raut’s critique falls in line with a growing sentiment among various political factions advocating for a return to traditional voting methods. The controversy surrounding EVMs is not unique to India; it is a global debate with examples of countries moving away from electronic systems due to security and transparency issues. Raut’s commentary reflects a broader dissatisfaction with the current electoral framework and its implications for democracy in India.
In conclusion, Sanjay Raut’s discourse on electronic voting machines highlights significant concerns regarding their impact on the democratic process in India. By drawing comparisons with other nations that have opted for ballot paper voting, Raut reinforces his argument against EVMs and calls for a reevaluation of the electoral mechanism. His statements reflect a sincere apprehension about electoral integrity, positioning his party’s stance within a wider context of political opposition to the prevailing system. Raut’s views, paired with criticisms of judicial figures and political leaders, illustrate a strategic approach aimed at mobilizing support against what he perceives to be a flawed electoral process.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
