Fracture in Sudan’s Tagaddum Coalition Over Parallel Government Contrasts
Sudan’s Tagaddum coalition is officially splitting into factions over proposed parallel government plans. This division highlights existing rifts within the group amid military-conflict tensions. The leadership, led by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, concluded that differing views warranted separate platforms. Each faction will now pursue its own strategy to achieve peace and counter previous regimes’ influences.
Sudan’s primary civilian coalition, Tagaddum, has recently announced a formal division among its factions regarding the establishment of a parallel government. The fracture underscores the increasing tensions within the civilian coalition, particularly amid the ongoing conflict between the military and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia. This decision follows a significant push from Deputy Chairperson al-Hadi Idris, aimed at creating a civilian government to contest the legitimacy of General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan’s appointed administration in Port Sudan.
In a statement released by Tagaddum, the leadership, led by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, recognized the necessity of a formal separation due to the differing opinions within the coalition. The official position articulated in the statement proposes that each faction should operate under distinct political and organizational frameworks, presenting themselves with two new names. This split is anticipated to foster a clearer path forward for both factions as they pursue their respective aims.
The separate factions will now focus on distinct strategies to resolve the ongoing conflict, advocate for lasting peace, promote democratic governance, and mitigate the influence of the former regime. Although Tagaddum did not specify the factions opposing the notion of a parallel government, it acknowledged that these groups constitute a majority within the coalition. Supporters of the proposed parallel government include notable figures from the Sovereignty Council and heads of smaller political factions.
The divisions surfaced recently with the formation of a committee dedicated to addressing the escalated contention surrounding a parallel government in areas controlled by the RSF. Concurrently, the Sudanese government revealed a roadmap aimed at post-conflict stabilization, which entails establishing a cabinet of technocrats, appointing a civilian prime minister, and initiating a national dialogue as military forces claim territorial progress against the RSF.
Overall, Tagaddum’s fragmentation signifies a critical shift within Sudan’s civilian political landscape, as varied strategies come to the forefront aimed at ending the conflict and establishing a peaceful democratic order. The upcoming actions of each faction will likely shape the future political stability of Sudan as they separate and pursue their goals independently.
The fracturing of Sudan’s Tagaddum coalition signals a significant shift within its political landscape, driven by internal divisions over the formation of a parallel government. As factions establish distinct strategies to address the conflict, this division may influence the future trajectory towards peace and democratic governance in Sudan. Moving forward, each faction’s independent actions will be pivotal in determining the coalition’s effectiveness in advocating for civilian rule and stability.
Original Source: www.dailynewsegypt.com
