Trump’s Influence on Jordan and Egypt Regarding Gaza Crisis
Trump’s discussions on Gaza have prompted Jordan and Egypt to take action, including relocation offers for children and commitments to reconstruction. His plans are generating mixed responses across the Middle East, raising concerns and criticisms from other nations, while pushing regional players to reconsider their roles. This reflects a significant attempt to shift longstanding patterns of inactivity in the region.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s ongoing discussions regarding Gaza have prompted notable movements in Jordan and Egypt. For several weeks, Trump has articulated a vision for U.S. control over Gaza, seeking international cooperation for its reconstruction, further amplified by his media engagements. During a meeting with King Abdullah of Jordan, Trump expressed America’s commitment to taking and “cherishing” Gaza.
King Abdullah indicated that Jordan could accommodate 2,000 children from Gaza, suggesting helicopter transport to facilitate their relocation. Similarly, Egypt is also aligning with some of Trump’s positions, publicly committing to participate in the reconstruction efforts. Trump’s persistent engagements have drawn attention from nations such as Iran, which has accused the U.S. of threatening to cut aid to Egypt and Jordan unless they align with Washington’s expectations.
Lebanon’s new Prime Minister, Nawaf Salam, has criticized Trump’s plans, stating, “Trump’s plan to displace Palestinians is reprehensible and unacceptable, and we support the two-state solution.” Moreover, reports in Lebanese media suggest that Trump’s approach may impact ongoing ceasefire negotiations, as he has demanded the release of hostages by February 15th. Hamas is reportedly reassessing its strategies amid threats from Israel to intensify military action, especially given the firm backing from the Trump administration.
Countries across the Middle East are responding uniquely to Trump’s declarations, with both Jordan and Egypt displaying a willingness to move toward U.S. objectives. Historically, these nations have been reluctant to engage actively with the Hamas and Gaza challenges, having failed to alert Israel about the Hamas plans prior to October 7. While Jordan has extended aid to Gaza, there has been a perceived lack of urgency from both countries to address the crisis.
Trump’s doctrine encourages active involvement from Middle Eastern nations, urging them to transcend previous inertia. The region has long been trapped in a cycle of crises; the recent conflict on October 7 exemplifies the urgent need for proactive measures. Although the Biden administration has promoted regional integration post-Abraham Accords, it faltered as key players did not rally around Israel in its time of need.
In contrast, Trump’s administration is attempting to inspire a different dynamic, though it remains uncertain whether Jordan and Egypt can fully deliver on proposals such as resettling vast numbers of Gazans. The essence lies not necessarily in achieving every goal but in initiating substantial dialogue. Trump’s initial proposals regarding the movement of 1.7 million Gazans and America’s role in Gaza represent a strategic starting point for diplomatic negotiations, allowing room for compromise and potential success.
In summary, President Trump’s efforts to address the Gaza crisis have spurred responses from Jordan and Egypt, signaling potential shifts in Middle Eastern dynamics. While reactions from neighboring countries, including criticisms from Lebanon, highlight complex regional sentiments, Trump’s strategies exemplify an attempt to revitalize a stagnant political landscape. Establishing dialogues and setting bold initial demands may pave the way for future negotiations and cooperation, indicating a proactive U.S. stance in the region.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
