Concerns Rise as Paramilitary Forces Attempt to Establish Parallel Government in Sudan
The RSF’s initiative to create a “parallel government” in Sudan has ignited significant concerns over increased divisions in the nation amid ongoing conflict with the SAF. The Sudanese government has rejected this move, deeming it illegitimate. Analysts warn of its potential to exacerbate the political and economic crisis, while global leaders express alarm at the possible ramifications for Sudan’s stability.
On February 22, 2023, the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and their allied groups introduced a “political charter” in Kenya, intending to establish a “parallel government” in Sudan. This ambition has incited considerable concern both domestically and internationally, especially as Sudan continues to face turmoil due to ongoing conflict between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). The Sudanese government has rebuffed the initiative, labeling it “stillborn.”
Sudan has been embroiled in violent conflict for close to two years, leading to over 29,600 fatalities and displacing more than 15 million individuals, according to various crisis monitoring organizations. Political analysts assert that the current discord stems from unsuccessful attempts at political settlements, illustrating deepening divisions in the nation.
Experts argue that the RSF’s proposal to create a parallel governance structure highlights the changing power dynamics within Sudan. “The features of division in Sudan have become more evident,” warned Dr. Khalid Dirar, emphasizing the implications of this shift. Ahmed Ismail, a military expert, acknowledged that this development could significantly alter the balance of power as the RSF extends its influence beyond familiar territorial confines.
There are significant risks associated with the establishment of a parallel government, as noted by political analyst Abdul-Rahman Awad. He cautioned that a dual governance structure could exacerbate the existing political, security, and economic crises in Sudan. However, Abdul-Khaliq Mahjoub expressed skepticism regarding the RSF’s capacity to successfully implement this government, citing military developments that could undermine its viability.
Globally, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed profound concern about the potential escalation of the conflict, underscoring the importance of Sudan’s unity and territorial integrity in achieving lasting peace. Saudi Arabia also condemned the RSF’s plans, reaffirming their commitment to the official governance structures of Sudan as the legitimate authority representing the people, as stated by the Saudi Foreign Ministry.
The RSF’s charter signing in Nairobi has further strained relations between Sudan and Kenya, prompting Sudan to summon its ambassador for consultations. The Sudanese government has vowed to impose economic sanctions against Kenya, notably targeting the import of Kenyan goods. These escalating tensions reflect Sudan’s serious discontent regarding foreign involvement in its internal affairs.
The RSF’s attempt to form a parallel government in Sudan signals a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict, revealing deepening divisions and altering power dynamics within the nation. While the international community expresses grave concerns over this initiative, the Sudanese government remains firm in its rejection. The situation underscores the pressing need for unity and a return to legitimate governance to avert further crises in Sudan.
Original Source: english.news.cn
